From Rock Music to The Rock Man: Half Asleep and Waking Up

I was twelve years old for most of 1971. Right now the year is like a quasar: shiny, mysterious, and moving ever-farther away. But back then, the Universe didn’t extend much beyond Bartlesville, Oklahoma, where I had a paper route, went to Scout meetings on Monday nights, and left behind the shores of Catholic school sixth grade toward the undiscovered country of public junior high. On that last day at Saint John’s, my mom picked up me and three younger siblings (unusual, since we walked to all our schools), and I caught my finger in the car door, leaving a swelling that lasted well into June. Memorable as that seems to be, it was one of the lesser events of the year.

One greater event was best appreciated by the kids: Bartlesville, with its two high schools, four movie screens, and a bison herd (well outside city limits), had finally merited its own McDonald’s restaurant. “Here We Grow Again” read the sign at the site, beneath the familiar double parabolas that till then had been fifty miles away in the Big City (i.e. Tulsa). My sister Nina was hired as one of the first employees. This led to an event as wonderful and unexpected to this growing boy as finding a copy of Mad magazine with a ten-dollar bill inside. In what would now be called a “soft opening,” families of the employees were invited to come and give the place and its people some live practice by dining in free of charge. Holy hog heaven, Batman! I finished my Big Mac, licked my fingers, and marched back to the counter to ask for a Quarter Pounder chaser. It was definitely my kind of place, even if for just one evening. The memory, and likely an ample dose of LDL cholesterol, will be with me to the end.

Nina had graduated and was heading off to college. This led to a reapportioning of living space at the house, so that my brother Neal and I no longer had to share a bedroom. While this brought the joy one would expect (Begone, bunk bed!), some of the changes were more subtle in their arrival. One of them involved the radio.

I had a Sears Silvertone clock radio, stately in its woodgrain-like plastic, that had been handed down to me (as was so much in my life then) from my brother Eric. With its elliptical analog face and slide-rule dial covering the full AM band, I now had the power to wake up at the hour of my choice and accomplish one of my life’s daily goals: to get up early enough to be the first one to the bathroom. And not only could I be roused from my slumber by music (or possibly news or commercials, but still better than a buzzer), but likewise I could set the device to lull me to sleep with such music, and shut itself off up to an hour later. O brave new world…

At about this same time, a three column-inch display ad showed up in the local paper. In what appeared to be hand-drawn outline text, it said, “Rock is coming to KWON in the nighttime”. KWON (serving Washington, Osage, and Nowata Counties) was at that time the sole local AM station in B’ville, broadcasting at 1000 Watts (250 at night) its programming of soft-pop music, live interviews of local interest, a Saturday morning radio want-ads show, network news on the hour, and Paul Harvey with his commentary and stories, all of which he claimed were true. Now, the influx of rock music into such a wholesome environment cannot have come lightly. The listening audience for local radio were largely hardworking people, children of the Depression, World War II veterans. For many, the term “longhair music” still meant Beethoven and Liszt. They might have decided that Elvis was basically a fine young man (he had served in the Army, after all, and had met with President Nixon in the White House), but felt comfortable listening only to his recordings of Gospel music. Changes were accepted reluctantly, if at all; not too many years later, a local man purchased a quarter-page newspaper ad containing his considered opinion of the metric system, declaring it impractical, expensive, and “illegal.” So why upset a smooth-sailing ship? KWON already had perfectly good late-evening programming, a parade of mellow big-band tunes called “Starlight Serenade,” which would soothe its listeners into pleasant dreams after a long day. Rock music grated on the ears, lured children away from their parents, talked about “love” without ever mentioning “marriage.” And don’t even get started on that profane “Jesus Christ Superstar” atrocity.

The radio station went ahead with it, likely prompted by some local advertisers, who saw their growing market of young consumers slipping away in favor of stations from Tulsa that played music they wanted to hear. And so rock music came to Bartlesville. Why, we even got a live concert from a nationally known band, Rare Earth, performing at our high school stadium. I didn’t attend, but it almost wasn’t necessary. From our house nearly a mile away, I could hear most of the music, including what seemed an endless version of their hit, “I Just Want to Celebrate.”

So at this point I had my own room, a radio, and a new world of music to listen to. To be fair, it wasn’t entirely new. My older siblings, Nina and Eric, had gotten there ahead of me, not unnoticed. Nina insisted on watching the The Lloyd Thaxton Show on TV after school a few years earlier, a dance music show that had the nerve to be on at the same time as our beloved Mr. Zing and Tuffy Show. Eric was the electronics whiz, who built Heathkit audio components and even his own light box. He had the family’s first FM radio, and recorded his own 8-track tapes. His music tastes were more influential to me (perhaps because they were louder); my fondness for “Madman Across the Water” goes directly back to him, and I still remember him introducing me to the fantastic drum solo in “In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida.” Miss you, Big Brother.

Since the music came over the radio in the evenings, it was only natural that I’d be listening to it at bedtime (9 p.m. in those days, or 8:30 on Saturdays because I’d be getting up at 3 a.m. to deliver newspapers). I’d turn the little switch on the clock radio to 60-minute shutoff, turn out the lights and that was it. Now, I can’t say with certainty that the songs I heard  in half-slumber affected my dreams, but the images they brought stayed with me and made me wonder. Why was someone apologizing to Uncle Albert?  The idea of “heads across the sky” was disturbing, and to this day I don’t know what that vocal noise is in the split second after “The butter wouldn’t melt so I put it in a pie.” Then there was The Who’s lyric “They decide and the shotgun sings the song.” That was pretty jolting, even in a time when every day’s top story was about the Vietnam War, which seemed to have been going on all my life and always would be. And I had no idea what was going on between Rod Stewart and Maggie May, but it didn’t sound pleasant. And no, Lee Michaels, I did not “Know What you Mean.” The songs “Draggin’ the Line” and “One Toke Over the Line” made no sense to me. “Riders on the Storm” sounded downright creepy (Dorian mode will do that, I learned years later in music theory class), though it had nothing on Bloodrock’s “D.O.A.”

In general, I reconciled myself to not ever understanding what a lot of the lyrics meant; in the case of some songs like “Roundabout,” that was just as well. Sometimes just the harmonies or instrumentation intrigued me. The fast keyboarding in “Won’t Get Fooled Again” seemed downright impossible. The horn harmonies in “Temptation Eyes” had a slightly off, and therefore alluring sound. And the bands Chicago and Chase got my attention with their prominent use of trumpets, an instrument I actually knew how to play. Since the evening programming was largely Top 40, I heard these songs over and over, usually when half-asleep. Maybe their influence was much like sleep-learning, something Eric told me he’d learned about in psychology class.

This is not to say that this influx of loud, incomprehensible and therefore dangerous music heralded a decline of civilization in the heart of Green Country. KWON radio stayed in business, broadcasting from its studios in the Caney River floodplain. Local standards were maintained. About two years later, when Paul Simon’s “Kodachrome” hit the charts, Bartlesville listeners heard the song with the word “crap” scissored out of the first line (literally, by the sound of it).

(A side note—it’s easy to forget nowadays that songs back then, even big hits, had a limited life on radio. And once they were gone, they were gone. A song that tickled—or assaulted—the ears a dozen times a day for a month or two might then not be heard on local airwaves for years. They were still available on records or tapes, but even those might get hard to find. Just a few years later, a radio station here in Tucson wanted to play Arlo Guthrie’s “Alice’s Restaurant Massacree” on Thanksgiving Day, but discovered that they no longer had a copy, and appealed to listeners for someone to bring one to the studio. This vanishing music circumstance led to a generation of listeners who might have wondered for decades afterward if they had really heard a song called “Back When My Hair Was Short,” or just imagined it. As the Boomer generation aged into mass marketability, oldies stations popped up, and now you don’t have to search hard to find the tunes of your past, including those you wish had stayed buried. Looking at you, “Piña Colada Song.”)

But while rock music was shaping my semi-conscious brain, something else appeared to me, on TV, that affected me more than I would realize for a long time.

In early February, 1971, just days after my twelfth birthday, the ABC Movie of the Week brought an unusual offering. It was a full-length cartoon, titled The Point. Outside of Disney, and the annual Charlie Brown specials, cartoons in prime time just weren’t happening, not since The Flintstones had ended about five years earlier. And in the previews I could see that this one had a very modern, very artistic look about it. So at 7:30, my homework completed (presumably), I took my place in front of our 19-inch black-and-white television to see what this was about.

It started with a framing narrative (sorry, that’s my creative writing degree talking) of a man putting his young son to bed. The son told his mom that he would turn out the lights once his program was over.  Wow, this movie was about me! The father, voiced by some actor named Dustin Hoffman, talked about how kids used to like having their parents read stories to them, and chose a book from the shelf. He began reading, while his son stared at a blank TV screen by the bed.

The tale took place in what was called The Land of Point, where everything and everyone had an actual physical point on them. Not sharp points, except maybe on the buildings, but pointed protrusions all the same. One day, a baby is born in the village with a cute, round, point-free head. The parents, who named their child Oblio, loved him dearly, despite the comments from all their neighbors and friends. When Oblio is old enough to go to school, his mother makes him a pointed hat to wear, so that he would appear more “normal” and therefore acceptable to the other kids. And so Oblio’s life seems a happy one, playing with his friends and his ever-faithful dog, Arrow.

Conflict soon comes, of course. The evil son of an evil Count tries to bar Oblio from a game of triangle toss, because, well, the no-point thing. Oblio sees this as unfair, and claims he and Arrow can beat the Count’s son in a one-on-one of the game. Oblio wins, the Count’s son is humiliated, and the Count seeks to avenge his son. The count goes to the King, and reminds him that the one law in the town is that everything and everyone must have a point. Right. The King reluctantly agrees and allows the Count to take Oblio to trial. Oblio is found guilty because “the law is the law,” and he and Arrow are banished from the Land of Point out to the Pointless Forest.

(Now, I don’t remember whether I got all teary-eyed at this point, but I’d like to think that I did, because the idea of banishing a child away from his home and parents is a tragic thing, and reacting strongly to that is part of who I am.)

So Oblio assures his parents that he will be all right, and he and Arrow head out to the Pointless Forest. That’s where the real story begins. This is a journey tale, not unlike Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland or The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, in which the main character meets others along the way who affect him and indirectly teach him things about life.

Shortly after arriving at the Pointless Forest, Oblio and Arrow meet the Pointed Man, who has three faces and points going every which way. Arrow is not too sure about this character (and anybody I knew would have been terrified), but Oblio politely introduces himself to the Pointed Man and asks him for advice on which way to go. The Pointed Man (who in Shakespeare’s day was Puck) tells him a number of confusing things, concluding that “A point in all directions is the same as no point at all.” Besides being a capsule description of vector physics, this admonition is food for thought about a person’s own moral compass. No doubt more than one Sunday sermon sprang from this tidbit.

The Pointed Man vanishes as mysteriously as he appeared, and Oblio and Arrow proceed further. Soon they encounter my favorite character, the Rock Man. He’s a laid-back, smooth talking hepcat (I’ve since learned that his voice is patterned after Beat comedian Lord Buckley, who has now joined my list of revered long-dead raconteurs). He advises Oblio to take things easy and enjoy life, and let go of his obsession with finding a point in things. “You don’t have to have a point to have a point.” How many pieces of advice do you remember from age 12? This is one of mine.

Oblio and Arrow encounter still others in the Pointless Forest, including three billowing ladies who personify the phrase “dance like no one’s watching,” and a Tree Man who invites the two to join his leaf manufacturing and distribution empire. The Pointed Man appears several more times, each time declaring Oblio’s adventures to be “Pointless!”, leading to Oblio asserting himself and his experiences all the more. The Pointed Man’s point, like the character itself, may not always be visible, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t there.

Not surprisingly, Oblio’s story ends happily. And for me, one of the most touching moments comes when the father puts the book back onto the shelf, and is leaving the room, when his son stops him to thank him for reading that story. It’s a minor detail, but I actually recalled it a few times many years later when reading stories to my own sons.

Although the director and animator of the film was Fred Wolf, it’s really the brainchild of Harry Nilsson, who conceived the story and wrote the accompanying music. In a unique achievement for a TV movie, one of its songs (“Me and My Arrow”) actually charted and was heard on the radio for much of the year. The film appeared a couple more times on television, but it was over twenty-five years before I saw it again.

So what is it from this 74-minute film that has stayed with me over the decades? Many lessons took years to sink in, but they were all there in the Pointless Forest. One is that everyone has something to teach you. Everyone has a point, you might say. Another is that fear shouldn’t prevent you from being kind. Oblio encountered characters that ranged from unusual to bizarre, yet he greeted them all warmly and spoke to them as friends. The only times he ever showed fear was when he worried for the safety of his best friend Arrow. I don’t claim to have achieved such casual bravery, but I certainly aspire to it even now. David Bowie expressed it simply the following year in his lyric “Turn and face the strange.” I posted those words on my classroom wall, as much a reminder to me as to my students.

Also, I didn’t have a dog of my own at that time, but the loyalty and friendship between Oblio and Arrow showed me the possibility of something more precious than any material wealth. “Me and My Arrow” has played many times in my head when I’ve been with my dogs.

And a final lesson comes from the rock music as well as the Rock Man. Sometimes you have to let your guard down, give your caution and cynicism the night off, and just let things wash over you like the rain. I didn’t set out to “discover” this music that was new and jarring. (My tastes at the time were mostly light classical and Tijuana Brass; yes, believe it.) But in letting it in semi-consciously, accepting it unquestioningly the way we accept absurdities in our dreams, I opened myself to new choices for my musical tastes. I could decide later–and did–which ones I liked and disliked, but first I had to give it the chance to enrich me however it might. As the Rock Man put it, “Dig me, taking it all in.”

That year, on the threshold of adolescence (and its cathedral, junior high school), an animated film on network television imparted to me that things in life, even if they lack sense, fairness, or comprehendible lyrics, all potentially have a point. Dig it.

God, No… Part 1: Testimony

fullsizeoutput_6a4eFolks, I am an atheist.

That is to say, I do not believe in the existence of a conscious entity that (1) created (and maintains, or not) all things, (2) established a moral and behavioral code for human beings, and (3) evaluates and redistributes whatever individual essence remains after a body ceases to function. I suppose you could call that the Holy Trinity of godly purposes.

For those who are still reading, I apologize for the clinical (some would say profane) nature of the previous paragraph. I am well aware of the deep emotional (some would say spiritual) significance that this subject holds in many people’s lives, and that attempting to discuss the matter dispassionately but also inoffensively is akin to walking on eggshells. With clown shoes. Spiked clown shoes. So why travel this path? Waddle along with me and see.

As far as anyone knows, human beings are the only creatures that question their own existence. And boy, do we question it. From the time we ask Mommy or Daddy where we come from, to having a crush on that person who doesn’t seem to know we’re alive, to realizing that our life didn’t come to an end along with that passionate relationship that one summer, to discovering meaning in our life when we took an unexpected turn off the path that we had thought led right to it, to running away from the family at age 82 only to die of pneumonia at the Astopovo train station…No, wait, that last one was just Tolstoy. If life is a journey, then the questions we have could all be placed in context of a travel guide: Where have I been? Where am I now? Where am I going? What’s the best way to get there? What are the accommodations there like? And why don’t people who go there ever come back, or even send postcards?

I am no exception in wanting such answers. And while we’re back to talking about me, here’s a brief digression: one of the best pieces of advice I ever received was, “Zealots are people who are so deeply immersed in their causes, that they have no perspective, let alone a sense of humor, about them. Avoid zealots of any stripe; don’t get involved with them, don’t become like them.” Having encountered a few zealots over the years, I’ve found this advice to be a life saver. Only some of them based their fervor in religion, but all seemed to suck the oxygen out of the room, leaving me gasping when I finally got away.

To be clear: not all religious people are zealots; on the contrary, most I find to be pleasant, engaging human beings. Am I a zealot in my atheism? I hope that the tone of this writing provides the answer to that.

So please, tell me more about your godless beliefs, you ask. Oh, I could write a book, but instead of making you wait a few years to buy it for $2.95 from the remainder table, I’ll give you some choice bits here for free. And I’ll do it in a Q&A format, because that way it looks like a conversation is going on, which is much more interesting to read than solid paragraphs. As Hamlet had his Horatio, as Myles na Gopaleen had his Plain People of Ireland, I’ll have an interrogator to sift me into revealing my innermost beliefs. Oh, yeah. And though I could give my question-monger a clever name like Mr. Italics or Al Terego, I won’t, because I’m still trying to think of a better one. And now, engage!

Were you always an atheist, or just since you knew how to spell it?

That is a tale I plan to unfold in a future essay, the highlights of which will include Catholic elementary school,  the Peanuts comic strip, an incident where I fainted at a Red Cross clinic, William Butler Yeats, and a Leo Buscaglia book for children. Your standard hagiology.

Do you feel like you’re superior to believers?

Wow, such a direct question. Who writes this stuff for you?

Well??

All right, all right. My belief, and my sincere hope, is no. We’re all seeking answers to the same questions, and finding to our frustration that our answers don’t exactly match those of the smart kid in the desk in front of us. But that’s because this is the SAT and that kid is working on the math section while you’re doing the reading section. Or this is where you’re trying to test out of first-year German and he’s testing out of French. Or some other metaphor out of a bad dream that you still have even though you’ve been out of school for decades, and…anyway, remember when I mentioned zealots a few paragraphs back? In 1979, when I was in college, I was able to attend an appearance by the country’s best-known professional atheist, Madalyn Murray O’Hair . The auditorium was packed, and I could tell that she knew how to play to a crowd of young people who were itching to tell the folks back home what kind of free thinking they were getting, to counteract all the years their parents spent bringing them up right. She spoke about how, as a lawyer, she filed the lawsuit that eventually led to the 1963 Supreme Court decision banning the requirement of students to recite Bible verses in public schools. She was forceful, self-righteous, and (to coin a phrase) a nasty woman.

This emerged particularly when she took questions from the audience. When asked why she spoke about believers in such condescending, even vicious language, her eyes widened. Her attitude came from intellectual contempt, she said, for those people who clung to foolish, outdated notions, and refused to come out of the Dark Ages. I had not heard that phrase before, or at all since, and whatever I felt about her cause, I was thoroughly repulsed by the way she sold it. When an obviously scared young woman expressed her confusion and overwhelming emotion at hearing such upsetting talk, Ms. O’Hair’s response was to shrug and say that she didn’t think of herself as scary at all. And when another young woman stated at the microphone that Ms. O’Hair clearly lacked “joy” in her life, the audience shouted her down, to the point that no response from the stage was necessary.

I found the experience enlightening, but not pretty. I had never before encountered someone who openly declared a disbelief in God, certainly not while growing up in northeastern Oklahoma, a well-worn notch in the Bible Belt. But while my courage to speak my mind in the face of contrary opinion was strengthened, I also learned that someone I basically agreed with could take it too far, to be a zealot. Or at least an asshole. And so I try not to be either.

Do you belong to any organizations that share your beliefs? Shorter answer, if you please.

I remember someone once asking if atheists had a church. My flip answer was along the lines of “Why? What would we do? Play bingo and claim tax exemptions?” But actually, no. I’ve never felt the desire to connect with American Atheists (founded by O’Hair) or other such groups. The Tucson chapter used to run Dial-An-Atheist, their counterpart to the recorded prayers people could get by phone, back in the days when people sometimes called a number deliberately to hear a recording. I called it only a couple of times. The angry tone and vitriol didn’t inspire me so much as it provided an example of how not to express my views. I do read books and articles on my own, but I’m not planning to attend anybody’s meetings, particularly if I’m expected to bring dues money or a side dish.

Do your family and friends know about this?

They do now. Just kidding–none of them read my blog. Actually, I decided years ago to be honest about this to anyone who asked, figuring that most people wouldn’t anyway. Those who do know still associate with me, or did the last time I checked. I know full well how divisive an issue this can be, and when the subject arises, I try to be a goodwill ambassador for my cause, and make the occasion a “teachable moment.” Which is sort of why I wrote all this to begin with. Some of the most enjoyable conversations I’ve had on the subject were with confirmed believers, including one or two people in ministry. I’ve found common ground most of the time, which I consider to be a fine achievement. As for my family, well, they’ve known me a long time and still invite me to visit. Actually, in some ways, the subject has brought us closer. Imagine that.

Do you worry at all that, well, you might be wrong?

No, no more than anybody else does, or should. More than once someone has brought up Pascal’s Wager, which is sort of a combination of theology and probability theory. My response is that it’s a false dichotomy; if one person believes in God, and another disbelieves in God, then actually they could both be wrong. Or, in the words of the philosopher Homer Simpson, “But what if we’re praying to the wrong god, and every time we do, the real god just gets madder?” So yes, I could be wrong, but I believe in “to thine own self be true” (and, it seems, in referencing Hamlet whenever possible) and hope for the best. I suppose that, if I’m right, I’ll never know it. But I can live–and die–with that. I don’t anticipate any kind of deathbed conversion. Fear of death (or lack thereof) is a topic for another essay.

So, why again are you telling us all this?

I do this partly to clarify my beliefs for my readers, by means of clarifying them for myself. Keep in mind the category of my website where this appears. Perhaps some people will be surprised, others will see it as old news, still others will nod and chew on it awhile. Part of my faith, I suppose, is that anyone actually cares what I have to say on the subject. You’re still here, aren’t you? Hello?

This is the first of what I anticipate to be a tetralogy trilogy series of at least two essays on the subject. Stick around. I might learn something.

[Curious about the signs? Discover them here.]

Toxic Fuming

IMG_0591

After all these years, I still don’t get anger.

Don’t misread the last word of that sentence. I wish I could say that I don’t get angry, and I’m working toward that goal. But I’m here to say that I don’t understand the special place that anger itself has been granted among all other human emotions.

To use the recent parlance, why is this still a thing? We consider ourselves civilized above all other animals: we are (relatively) discriminating about what we consume and where we excrete; we engage in commerce, recognizing that division of labor makes life more efficient and productive for everyone; we pass laws and amend them as society advances. But unlike lawlessness, unfair trading, and urinating in the swimming pool, we give anger a pass, even at times defending it by labeling it “justified,” or more frequently “righteous.”

This is not blind acceptance. Unlike, say, joy or sadness, we sometimes work to “manage” anger. An ancient culture included anger (aka “wrath” or “ire”) as one of the Seven Deadly Sins. But alone among the seven, anger is routinely blamed on other people. If you were to attribute your gluttony or your lust or your sloth to someone else’s actions, the message is that your own character is weak. In contrast, to say “You make me mad!” implies not just blamelessness but outright victimhood, accusing someone else of imposing on you an undesirable condition. Anger is not only the red-hot emotion, it’s also conveniently coated in Teflon.

What’s more, anger can be used as a  sort of bioweapon, deliberately sent to infect others for the purpose of harm. “I’m just doing that to piss him off,” is the reason given for some acts of aggression. (As if reason is actually involved.) Sometimes the action is more passive-aggressive: have you ever noticed how many political-themed postings bear a provocative headline that focuses not on facts, but on adverse reaction? The template is usually something like this: “[Someone we agree with] made this statement or took that action, and [someone we don’t agree with] is fuming mad about it.” It’s not enough to contradict someone’s opposing views; it seems equally important to incite anger in the opposition, because it hurts them and therefore pleases us. This also implies that once someone “makes” you angry, there is damn little you can do about it. It’s the raging white elephant that you are obligated to accept. Or is it?

My first epiphany in this matter came over forty years ago via that great 1970s art form, a made-for-TV movie. It was called The Silence, and starred Richard Thomas in the rather un-John Boy role of a military cadet who is unjustly accused of violating an institutional honor code, and receives the unofficial (but tradition-bound) hazing of internal exile, calculated to drive him toward resigning in disgrace, thus not tainting his class with his shame. The young man’s family hired an attorney to take the academy and its shadowy machinations to court. I don’t remember exactly how the movie ended, but it’s easy to guess. Remember, this was the time when the previous decade’s rebellion had filtered its way into network television as the respectable effort to Strike Back Against the System. Dragnet was no longer in production, and the starring characters in the law dramas were defense attorneys, all fighting the good fight against a corrupt, or at least unfeeling, tangle of rules.

At one point in the film, the attorney asks Thomas’ character, “Aren’t you angry about this?” The response: “I don’t get angry.”

Full stop. From this point onward, no further events in the story are retained in my memory. But the implication of that one terse statement oiled my philosophical gears for decades to come. Anger is a choice. Anger can be refused. 

Now, this is in distinction from a catchphrase shared by all too many revenge stories: “We don’t get mad; we get even.” Rejecting anger has little or nothing to do with righting a perceived wrong. It’s about not giving someone else the power to inflict an unreasoning and destructive emotion into your own psyche. It’s about maintaining a level of emotional integrity.

The meaning of that last sentence was especially welcome to me. I was in my seemingly endless adolescence, suffering the slings and arrows (and occasional pleasures) of a baffling array of emotions, all taking hold of me without warning and dragging me into psychological parts unknown. So, the notion that I could control anger was especially appealing at a time when I could barely control the pitch of my voice. Why wouldn’t it be? Anger had nothing positive to offer. The Incredible Hulk notwithstanding, anger doesn’t create heroes. Angry people break things. Angry people make statements they later regret. Angry people burn bridges (figuratively, but who knows?). Angry people are unreasonable, and reject reason in others. And angry people are simply unpleasant to be around, leaving a puddle of awkwardness and hurt feelings behind them. No one would choose anger if they didn’t have to. And apparently they didn’t have to.

I sat on this revelation for a long time. As with any discovery, the answers were soon outnumbered by new questions. If I knew about this, why did it seem that no one else did? If anger is a choice, why would anyone choose it? Is it just easier not to fight it? (That seemed likely.) Is it a bad habit, or even an addiction? If the latter is the case, then I must be cautious in approaching it in others. Even in my barely decade-and-a-half of life experience, I already knew that some people’s struggles were far more difficult than meets the eye. For example, I knew enough not to proclaim that quitting smoking is as simple as “Step One: spit the thing out. Step Two: there is no Step Two.” And I knew that anger is a more primal, more prevalent enemy than any drug addiction.

Also, anger has its defenders. It was anger with the Crown, some say, that led to the American Revolution. Anger with the prevailing social injustice sowed the seeds of the Civil Rights movement, women’s rights, LGBT rights. Hell, anger even prompted people to complain to the landlord about cockroach infestation. Those are all good results, right?

Good results, yes. But I contend that anger, at best, pushed the people along in the direction they were already headed. At best it is a catalyst, and not a reliable one. Anger is a force, but it’s not a vector force. (Pardon the high school physics reference.) Anger should never be asked to steer; anger pushes whichever way it pleases. Anger is not the car, but the JATO rocket tied to the car in the urban legend. Anger is fire, which is useful only when strictly controlled. Uncontrolled anger is potentially hellish.

Do I get angry? I wish I didn’t, but it does happen. And in those times I do my best to keep that anger to myself, even to the point of seclusion until I regain control. Yes, it can be difficult, but isn’t that part of the price of civilization? We don’t vomit in the presence of others, if we can help it, so why would we display anger? To do so is unkind, it brings discomfort to others. That said, I find it takes the utmost diplomacy sometimes when I’m around other people’s anger. To this day I still strongly fight the urge to say something along the lines of, “I’m sorry you choose to be so angry right now. How about if I leave you alone so that you can restore yourself to reason, and then we’ll see about solving whatever problem you have?” I’m not naive; I know that the result would be exactly the opposite of what I want. And yet, it’s precisely what I would hope someone would say to me. Seriously. By the same token, I outright reject the notion of “not going to bed angry.” Why carry out an angry exchange while the body grows more tired with each hour, when instead you can pause it, go to sleep, and discuss the matter next day when everyone is calmer?

No doubt some of you are now realizing that I was completely sincere in the opening statement of this essay.

You might wonder just how well I’m doing in trying to live up to this ideal. The answer is, I’ve had some success so far. When I was teaching, more than once I overheard students remark that “Mr. V never gets angry.” And recently, someone expressed gratitude for my not getting angry with them in a particular situation, adding that, if the roles were reversed, that person would certainly be angry with me. I couldn’t ask for a better compliment, I suppose, or at least I couldn’t expect one.

Some people are able to vent their anger, and then quickly return to normal. Some people seem to hold their anger for years, probably at the expense of relationships and their own happiness, if not their own health. For me, anger is a burden that carries no benefit, and as currency it can buy me nothing I wish to obtain. It’s the emotional equivalent of the appendix, whose usefulness is gone, leaving only potential harm. It’s a glowing, red-hot enigma. Someday I might see it in a different light, but until then I’m doing my best to keep it out of my life.

#anger

“I’ll Free You in My Dreams”

jones

The year 1979 marked the beginning of what I later called my Celebrated Blue Period. I was adjusting to a great many changes, the primary one being that I would spend my first summer in Tucson, a place that didn’t yet feel like home to me. It was at once exciting and frightening, a duality that I would experience again and again over the years. I was determined to be an adult, or at least act like one; wasn’t I now twenty years old, an ex-teenager? It was time to put away childish things. I wasn’t sure just which of my things were “childish,” or why I should suddenly divest myself of them. I had abandoned my major in astronomy (a science I had loved for about a decade, and the reason I had ventured to Arizona) after my disastrous grades in physics and differential equations had earned me Academic Probation, this less than two years after graduating in the top twenty of my high school class. I had changed my major to Creative Writing (with my parents’ approval, thankfully), and was going to add a second major in Russian Language. I would find an apartment and take summer classes.

What I didn’t know, and wouldn’t even guess (let alone be diagnosed) for another decade and a half, was that I was clinically depressed.

But this piece isn’t about my illness, or my later treatment. This is about a person whose art provided me with comfort and cushioning in those times when I was wrenchingly sad and didn’t know why.

In the spring of that year, when I was taking my first Russian course, Rickie Lee Jones released her eponymous debut album. I read about it in Newsweek–yes, that’s what I subscribed to–and even bought a copy of Rolling Stone where she was the cover story. I hadn’t actually heard any of her songs, because the radios in my car and Heathkit stereo were only AM, but I was impressed enough from what I read to buy the album one evening. (One of the first things I learned about Tucson was that record shops stayed open late, because if you purchased an LP before sunset, it would likely warp in your car on the way home.)

This must have been the fall of 1979. I had stayed the summer in an apartment that I remember had awful vinyl-coated furnishings and a neighbor who serenaded the courtyard every morning with “Carry On Wayward Son” at full blast. I was there as a placeholder in a friend-of-a-friend arrangement. (a story for another time). For a two-month stay I didn’t unpack my phonograph. Come August I took residence in a studio apartment about two blocks south of the university. I had no reservations whatever about living by myself.

Being a loner, however, did not preclude occasional times of loneliness. I did have my stereo, and my black-and-white TV, and what seemed at the time to be a lot of books (not even a hundred, as I recall; hardly the library I have now, though a good many are the same ones). I would go to movies, either on campus or at the local art house, which was within walking distance. I’d always go alone, with a book to read before the lights dimmed.

In the evening I might listen to music, often with the lights off. To this day, there are certain pieces that I always associate with late night: Steely Dan’s Aja is one, Rachmaninoff’s Symphony №3 is another. Rickie Lee Jones’ album I’d play at different times of the day. I noticed even then that my mood, or the hour, sometimes greatly affected my perception of one song or another. In one listening, “The Last Chance Texaco” might sound like a silly overextended metaphor, but the next time, it would be downright painful. “Coolsville” could be merely dark, or almost menacing.

I kept trying to make out the stories. “I and Braggart” would appear in songs that otherwise seemed to have no connection. And I wanted to know more about Sal saying goodbye to Angela, Perry and Mario.

“On Saturday Afternoons in 1963,” had not just a great title, but the ability to evoke things in my head that stayed long after the final chord. “After Hours” put me right there in the dark of midnight, assuming I wasn’t there already.

Then there’s “Company,” which provided my essay’s title. I would have denied at the time that I was lonely in that upstairs studio apartment, but this song made me feel every bit of it nonetheless. It was not a painful song; instead, it was a song full of pain. Rather than depress me to hear it, it helped me to sort out what I was already feeling. It’s still one of my favorite songs.

From what I had read, Ms. Jones was having turbulent times herself. I was fortunate enough to see her in concert at the University Main Auditorium (now Centennial Hall) at the time her second album was released. Maybe it was the strain of a tour, but something just didn’t look right with her. During one song, in a quiet moment, she turned to the audience and said, “Come on, people, wake up!” We all had been intently listening; I’m still not sure what else she had expected.

Rickie Lee Jones has continued on in the decades since, her style in continuous evolution. I admire people who can reinvent themselves and their art; maybe a better word is “re-explore.” I’m different in some ways as well, although the Guy from 1979 will remain a part of me, as it must. Without him, part of my inner core would be missing, and the rest of me would be a little hollow.

This is not a love note, or even a fan letter. If anything, it’s an acknowledgment of gratitude for the fact that a certain musician’s creation touched me at a time when it could do a lot of good. Ms. Jones will likely never see this, but I will always think of her as someone who helped me get through some times of confusion and hurt. What more could an artist be asked to do?

 

 

#RickieLeeJones #depression

Verified by MonsterInsights